Skip to content
Search
Log In
Search
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Projected Paragraphs
Activity
Projected Paragraphs
Cost
Free
Skills
Text Structure
Grades
K-1
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students identify the main idea and supporting details in an expository text.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
20 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
1:1
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Platform
Readworks
Grammar + Syntax
Inference
Perspective Taking
Vocabulary
Readworks
Designed as a supplemental resource, this student facing platform provides the opportunity for students to listen to texts and articles on various topics through different genres.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
4-5
,
6-8
,
9-12
,
K-1
,
PK
Cost
Free
Activity
Expository Exploration
Reasoning
Text Structure
Expository Exploration
In this activity, students identify the main idea and supporting details in an expository text.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
Activity
Fiction and Nonfiction Review
Text Structure
Fiction and Nonfiction Review
Students will determine if a text is fiction or nonfiction by noticing features of the text.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).