Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Fiction and Nonfiction Review
Activity
Fiction and Nonfiction Review
Cost
Free
Skills
Text Structure
Grades
2-3
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students will determine if a text is fiction or nonfiction by noticing features of the text.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
20 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Choice Meanings
Vocabulary
Choice Meanings
In this activity students examine the meaning of words in context.
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
Practice
•
Routine
•
Strategy
Ready, Set, Talk
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Ready, Set, Talk
This resource is a strategy to help educators facilitate robust conversations with students in early grades.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
K-1
,
PK
Cost
Free
Tool
How to Teach Comprehension Monitoring
Comprehension Monitoring
How to Teach Comprehension Monitoring
This site provides an overview of comprehension monitoring and strategies practitioners can introduce to students as tools for monitoring their own comprehension.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
K-1
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).