Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Retell-A-Story
Activity
Retell-A-Story
Cost
Free
Skills
Text Structure
Grades
2-3
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students retell a narrative story using scaffolded questions.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
1:1
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Compare-A-Story
Reasoning
Text Structure
Compare-A-Story
Students compare and contrast narrative texts to determine similarities and difference among the texts’ story elements.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
Activity
Character Consideration
Inference
Perspective Taking
Text Structure
Character Consideration
In this activity students identify characteristics of characters in a narrative/fiction text.
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
Routine
Perspective Taking: Science and Social Studies Connection
Perspective Taking
Perspective Taking: Science and Social Studies Connection
This resource is a framework for an activity where students explore historical, weather, or science phenomenons and analyze historical viewpoints through listening to aligned texts or audio about historical events.
Grade Level(s)
N/A
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).