Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Text Structure Sort
Activity
Text Structure Sort
Cost
Free
Skills
Text Structure
Grades
4-5
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students identify elements of an expository/nonfiction text.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
1:1
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Antonym Match-Up
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Antonym Match-Up
In this actvity students will identify matching antonyms (eg., hot/cold).
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
Intervention
•
Supplemental Curriculum
SKILL (4th Edition)
Grammar + Syntax
Inference
Perspective Taking
Reasoning
Text Structure
Vocabulary
SKILL (4th Edition)
SKILL is designed to support the development of key language skills through lessons that are standards aligned.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
4-5
,
K-1
Cost
Free
Activity
Cause and Effect Roll
Grammar + Syntax
Reasoning
Text Structure
Vocabulary
Cause and Effect Roll
In this activity students are provided with two stacks of cause/effect cards. Students take turns matching cause and effect sentence cards.
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).