Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Retell Review
Activity
Retell Review
Cost
Free
Skills
Text Structure
Grades
4-5
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students use a fiction text to identify story elements and retell a story.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
1:1
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Tool
Active Discussion of Text Resources
Grammar + Syntax
Inference
Perspective Taking
Reasoning
Vocabulary
Active Discussion of Text Resources
This site has information, examples, and resources on how to implement active discussions after students have engaged with complex text.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
4-5
,
K-1
Cost
Free
Activity
Story Grammar Yammer
Inference
Text Structure
Story Grammar Yammer
Students work to identify varying story elements of narrative text
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
Strategy
Learning to Infer
Comprehension Monitoring
Inference
Perspective Taking
Learning to Infer
This resource provides a clear lesson outline for practitioners to use to introduce and practice Inference.
Grade Level(s)
6-8
,
9-12
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).