Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Story Grammar Yammer
Activity
Story Grammar Yammer
Cost
Free
Skills
Inference
Text Structure
Grades
2-3
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.2
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.8
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.7
,
RL.8
,
RL.9
,
SL.2
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students work to identify varying story elements of narrative text
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
20 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
1:1
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Story Element Sort
Text Structure
Story Element Sort
Students sort parts of a story into correpsonding story element categories.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
Supplemental Curriculum
Core Knowledge Language Arts
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Core Knowledge Language Arts
The Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) curriculum builds students’ reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills through an integrated literacy approach.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
K-1
,
PK
Cost
Free
Activity
Hoop-A-Story Venn Diagram
Inference
Text Structure
Hoop-A-Story Venn Diagram
In this activity students compare/contrast fiction texts by comparing/contrasting story elements of each text.
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).