Skip to content
Search
Log In
Search
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Cause and Effect Organizer
Activity
Cause and Effect Organizer
Cost
Free
Skills
Inference
Reasoning
Grades
K-1
Standards
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.2
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.7
,
RI.8
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.2
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.7
,
RL.8
,
RL.9
,
SL.1
,
SL.2
,
SL.4
,
Speaking and Listening
What is it?
In this activity students will identify cause and effect relationships throughout a read aloud. This activity can be modified so students are only engaging with oral text responding through discussion.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Detail Delight
Reasoning
Text Structure
Detail Delight
In this activity students listen to an expository text and identify key details
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
Activity
Story Question Cube
Inference
Text Structure
Vocabulary
Story Question Cube
Students take turns rolling a cube and answering questions about a narrative text.
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
Activity
Story Grammar Yammer
Inference
Text Structure
Story Grammar Yammer
Students work to identify varying story elements of narrative text
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).