Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Compare-A-Story
Activity
Compare-A-Story
Cost
Free
Skills
Reasoning
Text Structure
Grades
2-3
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.2
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.7
,
RI.8
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.2
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.1
,
SL.2
,
SL.4
,
Speaking and Listening
What is it?
Students compare and contrast narrative texts to determine similarities and difference among the texts’ story elements.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Know or No
Vocabulary
Know or No
In this activity students examine the meaning of vocabulary words.
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
Activity
Story Grammar Yammer
Inference
Text Structure
Story Grammar Yammer
Students work to identify varying story elements of narrative text
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
Intervention
Inference Galaxy: TeLCI
Inference
Vocabulary
Inference Galaxy: TeLCI
Inference Galaxy is a fully automated personalized learning platform that explicitly supports students’ vocabulary development and inference-making skills through assessment and instruction.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
K-1
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).