Skip to content
Search
Log In
Search
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Compare-A-Character
Activity
Compare-A-Character
Cost
Free
Skills
Perspective Taking
Text Structure
Grades
2-3
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.2
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.8
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.2
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.8
,
RL.9
,
SL.1
,
SL.3
,
SL.4
,
Speaking and Listening
What is it?
In this activity students compare and contrast characters from narrative texts
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
,
Whole Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Meaning Map
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Meaning Map
This activity engages students in describing target words and providing examples of the words.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
Cost
Free
Activity
Climb the Ladder
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Climb the Ladder
In this activity students will create sentences using a prompt and engage in dialogue about the sentence created. .
Grade Level(s)
PK
Cost
Free
Platform
Inference Galaxy: ELCI
Inference
Perspective Taking
Vocabulary
Inference Galaxy: ELCI
Inference Galaxy is a fully automated personalized learning platform that explicitly supports students’ vocabulary development and inference-making skills through assessment and instruction.
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).